Classifying ‘conditionals’: The traditional way is wrong

Analysis 60 (2):147–147 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Subjunctive biscuit and stand-off conditionals.Eric Swanson - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):637-648.
Jackson Classifying Conditionals.V. H. Dudman - 1991 - Analysis 51 (3):131 - 136.
Classifying Conditionals.Frank Jackson - 1990 - Analysis 50 (2):134-147.
Classifying Conditionals II.Frank Jackson - 1991 - Analysis 51 (3):137 - 143.
Doesn't-will and didn't-did.Charles B. Cross - 2002 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (1):101 – 106.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
193 (#103,726)

6 months
14 (#183,612)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

W(h)ither Metaphysical Necessity?John Divers - 2018 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 92 (1):1-25.
Three Twentieth-century Commonplaces about 'If'.V. H. Dudman - 2001 - History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (3):119-127.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
Attitudes de dicto and de se.David Lewis - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (4):513-543.
Belief and the Will.Bas C. van Fraassen - 1984 - Journal of Philosophy 81 (5):235-256.
Belief and the will.Bas C. van Fraassen - 2010 - In Antony Eagle (ed.), Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings. New York: Routledge. pp. 235-256.

View all 8 references / Add more references