Ifs and buts: Anca Gheaus’s flawed argument construction

Abstract

This is my response to a premise-by-premise argument in Anca Gheaus’s “Biological Parenthood: Gestational, Not Genetic.”

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The chain of love and duty.Anca Gheaus - 2017 - Forum for European Philosophy Blog.
Token worries.Anca Gheaus - 2015 - Forum for European Philosophy Blog.
Token worries.Anca Gheaus - 2017 - The Forum.
The Ethics of Parenthood – By Norvin Richards.Anca Gheaus - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (4):416-419.
Sufficientarian Parenting Must be Child-Centered.Anca Gheaus - 2017 - Law, Ethics and Philosophy 5:189-197.
Introduction: Symposium on The Nature and Value of Childhood.Anca Gheaus - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (S1):1-10.
Review of Michael Otsuka Libertarianism Without Inequality. [REVIEW]Anca Gheaus - 2006 - Imprints. Egalitarian Theoy and Practice 9 (2):141-50.
Review of Eva Feder Kittay Love's Labor. [REVIEW]Anca Gheaus - 2005 - The Romanian Journal of Society and Politics 5 (1):173-7.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-28

Downloads
115 (#156,038)

6 months
40 (#97,569)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

References found in this work

Biological Parenthood: Gestational, Not Genetic.Anca Gheaus - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (2):225-240.

Add more references