- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Comparing perception of Stroop stimuli in focused versus divided attention paradigms: Evidence for dramatic processing differences
Cognition 114 (2):129-150 (2010)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
When perception becomes conscious.Max Velmans - 1999 - British Journal of Psychology 90 (4):543-566.
Reaction time in focused and in divided attention.Anat Ninio & Daniel Kahneman - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (3):394.
Is human information processing conscious?Max Velmans - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):651-69.
Types of attention matter for awareness: a study with color afterimages.Shruti Baijal & Narayanan Srinivasan - 2009 - Consciousness and Cognition 18 (4):1039-1048.
Focused and divided attention to the eyes and ears : a research journey.Nelson Cowan - 2012 - In Jeremy M. Wolfe & Lynn C. Robertson (eds.), From Perception to Consciousness: Searching with Anne Treisman. Oxford University Press. pp. 32.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
16 (#924,050)
6 months
4 (#837,857)
2014-01-20
Downloads
16 (#924,050)
6 months
4 (#837,857)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Reclaiming the Stroop Effect Back From Control to Input-Driven Attention and Perception.Daniel Algom & Eran Chajut - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
Did I read or did I name? Diminished awareness of processes yielding identical ‘outputs’.Tanaz Molapour, Christopher C. Berger & Ezequiel Morsella - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1776-1780.
Metacognition of Working Memory Performance: Trial-by-Trial Subjective Effects from a New Paradigm.Andrew C. Garcia, Sabrina Bhangal, Anthony G. Velasquez, Mark W. Geisler & Ezequiel Morsella - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
The nature of Garner interference: The role of uncertainty, information, and variation in the breakdown in selective attention.Lior Niv, Rani Moran & Daniel Algom - 2022 - Cognition 218 (C):104950.
References found in this work
On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.Jonathan D. Cohen, Kevin Dunbar & James L. McClelland - 1990 - Psychological Review 97 (3):332-361.
Varieties of perceptual independence.F. Gregory Ashby & James T. Townsend - 1986 - Psychological Review 93 (2):154-179.
Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task.Ardi Roelofs - 2003 - Psychological Review 110 (1):88-125.
Driven by information: A tectonic theory of Stroop effects.Robert D. Melara & Daniel Algom - 2003 - Psychological Review 110 (3):422-471.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c88c7cdf7-qczmr uwo