Belief and Meaning. Essays at the Interface

Abstract

This paper recalls the motivation for a normative account of the conceptual content of our beliefs, namely the problem of rule-following. It employs Brandom’s social, inferential semantics as a paradigmatic example of such an account of conceptual content. The conceptual content of our beliefs – and the meaning of the sentences that we use – is normative in the sense that it is determined by social, normative practices. Nevertheless, a description of content and meaning is possible. The paper argues that the purpose of a normative account of conceptual content is a rational reconstruction in the sense of a conceptual analysis.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Grain and content.Stephen Neale - 1998 - Philosophical Issues 9:353-358.
Centered communication.Clas Weber - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (S1):205-223.
Non-conceptual Experiential Content and Reason-giving.Hemdat Lerman - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):1-23.
Perception and conceptual content.Alex Byrne - 2005 - In Matthias Steup & John Turri (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Blackwell. pp. 231--250.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
75 (#222,565)

6 months
4 (#799,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Esfeld
University of Lausanne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Empiricism and the philosophy of mind.Wilfrid Sellars - 1956 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1:253-329.

View all 19 references / Add more references