Hume’s Finite Geometry: A Reply to Mark Pressman

Hume Studies 26 (1):183-185 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “Hume on Geometry and Infinite Divisibility in the Treatise”, H. Mark Pressman charges that “the geometry Hume presents in the Treatise faces a serious set of problems”. This may well be; however, at least one of the charges Pressman levels against Hume invokes a false dichotomy, and a second rests on a non sequitur.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Standards of equality and Hume's view of geometry.Emil Badici - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4):448-467.
From inexactness to certainty: The change in Hume's conception of geometry.Vadim Batitsky - 1998 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 29 (1):1-20.
Geometry of *-finite types.Ludomir Newelski - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1375-1395.
Author's Response: A Reply to Mark Box.Adam Potkay - 1995 - Hume Studies 21 (2):340-343.
How to be a Pragmatist: C. I. Lewis and Humean Skepticism.John Greco - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):24-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
86 (#197,385)

6 months
13 (#197,903)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lorne Falkenstein
University of Western Ontario

Citations of this work

Certainly useless: empiricists’ uncomfortable relationship with intuition.Lewis Powell - 2023 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 31 (4):724-743.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references