Fracchia and Burkett on Tailism and the Dialectic

Historical Materialism 23 (2):228-238 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This commentary addresses criticism of Lukács’s early book Tailism and the Dialectic: A Defence of History and Class Consciousness. Two critiques published in Historical Materialism are analysed and alternative interpretations of Lukács’s theory developed. The commentary focuses on Lukács’s theories of class consciousness and his ideas on the social construction of nature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rejoinder to Fracchia and Lewontin.W. G. Runciman - 2005 - History and Theory 44 (1):30–41.
Whose burden?Joseph Fracchia - 2003 - History and Theory 42 (3):378–397.
Review. [REVIEW]Joseph Fracchia - 1995 - History and Theory 34:355-371.
Plotinus on dialectic.Annamaria Schiaparelli - 2009 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (3):253-287.
Apotheosizing the Party: Lukács’s Chvostismus und Dialektik.Lee Congdon - 2007 - Studies in East European Thought 59 (4):281 - 292.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-02

Downloads
29 (#555,479)

6 months
4 (#799,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Feenberg
Simon Fraser University

Citations of this work

Henryk Grossman and Critical Theory.Rick Kuhn - 2016 - History of the Human Sciences 29 (2):42-59.

Add more citations