The Role of Nature in Sexual Ethics

The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (1):69-76 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Traditional natural law theory grounds morality in human nature. In particular, it defines what is good for us in terms of the ends for the sake of which our natural faculties exist. For the traditional natural law theorist, our sexual faculties have two natural ends, procreative and unitive, and what is good for us in the context of sexuality is therefore defined in terms of these ends. The article provides an overview of this approach to sexual morality and its implications, and explains why the natural law theorist holds that the procreative and unitive ends cannot be separated. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13.1 (Spring 2013): 69–76.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant and Sexual Perversion.Alan Soble - 2003 - The Monist 86 (1):55-89.
Luce Irigaray and the philosophy of sexual difference.Alison Stone - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ethics and Sex.Igor Primoratz - 1999 - Routledge.
The Nature of Sexual Desire.James Giles - 2008 - University Press of America.
Darwin's Beautiful Notion: Sexual Selection and the Plurality of Moral Codes.Jason A. Tipton - 1999 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 21 (2):119 - 135.
Antigone's Nature.William Robert - 2010 - Hypatia 25 (2):412 - 436.
Can sexual harassment be salvaged?M. J. Booker - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (11):1171-1177.
Dark desires.Seiriol Morgan - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (4):377-410.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-12

Downloads
203 (#99,570)

6 months
21 (#128,287)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references