‘Ethnobiological equivocation’ and other misunderstandings in the interpretation of natures

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 84 (C):101333 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Atran's biodiversity parser: Doubts about hierarchy and autonomy.Eugene S. Hunn - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):576-577.
Equivocation as a Point of Order.Jim Mackenzie - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (3):223-231.
On equivocation.Tom Stoneham - 2003 - Philosophy 78 (4):515-519.
Ambiguity, Discretion, and the Sorites.Roy Sorensen - 1998 - The Monist 81 (2):215-232.
Scotism About Possible Natures.Thomas M. Ward - 2019 - Philosophical Quarterly 69 (275):393-408.
The structure of misunderstandings.Izchak M. Schlesinger & Sharon Hurvitz - 2008 - Pragmatics and Cognition 16 (3):568-586.
A Thirteenth-Century Interpretation of Aristotle on Equivocation and Analogy.Erline Jennifer Ashworth - 1991 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 17 (sup1):85-101.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-04

Downloads
20 (#771,752)

6 months
12 (#220,388)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Indigenous and Scientific Kinds.David Ludwig - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (1).
Does Cognition Still Matter in Ethnobiology?David Ludwig - 2018 - Ethnobiology Letters 9 (2):269-275.

Add more references