The illusion of semantic reference

In Andrea Bianchi (ed.), On Reference. Oxford University Press. pp. 11-39 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A lot of us have given up on the idea that there will be a naturalistic account of the relation of semantic reference and so have resolved to formulate our theories of semantics and communication without appeal to semantic reference. Still, there is a resilient intuition to the effect that I know the extensions of the terms of my language. This paper explicates that intuition without yielding to it. The key idea is to give a “skeptical” account of what it is to “know the meaning” of a word, by which I mean an account of the status that is granted to a person in saying that he or she “knows the meaning” of a word.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Semantics without reference.Christopher Gauker - 1990 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 31 (3):437-461.
Language, thought, logic, and existence.Richard Brown - 2007 - CALIPSO (Conference Addresses of the Long Island Philosophical Society Online) 1 (2):http://myweb.brooklyn.liu.edu/mc.
Sense and Reference on the Web.Harry Halpin - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (2):153-178.
Two-dimensional semantics.David J. Chalmers - 2006 - In E. Lepore & B. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.
Multiple Groundings and Deference.Antonio Rauti - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):317-336.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
269 (#76,094)

6 months
1 (#1,477,342)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Gauker
University of Salzburg

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references