A Reply to Lataster and Bilimoria’s “Panentheism: What It Is and Is Not”

Journal of World Philosophies 4 (1):201-203 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I summarize and critically respond to Raphael Lataster and Purushottama Bilimoria’s paper on panentheism. I show that their suggested concept of panentheism is useless for academic discourse because it refers to contradictory positions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Panentheism is Still Vague: A Reply to Lataster and Bilimoria.R. T. Mullins - 2019 - Journal of World Philosophies 4 (1):204-207.
Panentheism: What It Is and Is Not.Raphael Lataster & Purushottama Bilimoria - 2018 - Journal of World Philosophies 3 (2):49-64.
Wissenschaft ist Panentheismus.Benedikt Paul Göcke - 2011 - In Göcke Benedikt Paul & Wasmaier-Sailer Margit (eds.), Idealismus und natürliche Theologie. Verlag Karl Alber.
Ancient and contemporary expressions of panentheism.Chad Meister - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (9):e12436.
Models of God.Ted Peters - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):273-288.
Panentheism and its neighbors.Mikael Stenmark - 2019 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 85 (1):23-41.
Against Mereological Panentheism.Oliver D. Crisp - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (2):23-41.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-21

Downloads
39 (#410,943)

6 months
11 (#244,932)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benedikt Paul Göcke
Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Panentheism: What It Is and Is Not.Raphael Lataster & Purushottama Bilimoria - 2018 - Journal of World Philosophies 3 (2):49-64.
Heretics![author unknown] - 2002 - Philosophy Now 35:4-4.

Add more references