Quantifying-in Uses of Complex Demonstratives and the Semantics of Quantification

In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophical and Linguistic Analyses of Reference. Peter Lang. pp. 143-154 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Complex demonstratives and their singular contents.David Braun - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (1):57-99.
Demonstratives without rigidity or ambiguity.Ethan Nowak - 2014 - Linguistics and Philosophy 37 (5):409-436.
WCO, ACD and what they reveal about complex demonstratives.Daniel Altshuler - 2007 - Natural Language Semantics 15 (3):265-277.
Reference and Ambiguity in Complex Demonstratives.Geoff Georgi - 2012 - In William P. Kabasenche, Michael O'Rourke & Matthew H. Slater (eds.), Reference and Referring: Topics in Contemporary Philosophy, Volume 10. MIT Press. pp. 357-384.
A propositional semantics for substitutional quantification.Geoff Georgi - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (5):1183-1200.
Demonstratives as individual concepts.Paul Elbourne - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (4):409-466.
Complex demonstratives, QI uses, and direct reference.Jeffrey C. King - 2008 - Philosophical Review 117 (1):99-117.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-09

Downloads
1 (#1,904,130)

6 months
1 (#1,477,342)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Geoff Georgi
West Virginia University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references