Why Do I Say ‘Image’ When Discussing Vision? Or - Can We Ever See a Chair in its Totality?

Abstract

1. Our 'vision' of our surroundings is minimal as to the richness of what is out there. That is because our eyes and optical faculties are severely limited in seeing a semblance of that reality. 2. When speaking of 'reality', there are numberless levels of that subject matter. There is the reality of what each organism sees. There is the reality of the different conditions a perceiving person is in, for example, what is the speed the observing agent watching the perceived object and that will change the 'reality' of what they see if we change the speed. 3. In summation there is no unity in any perceived object.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Iris Murdoch: Moral Vision.Anil Gomes - 2022 - In Silvia Caprioglio Panizza & Mark Hopwood (eds.), Murdochian Mind. New York, NY: Routledge.
Democritus' Ophthalmology.Kelli Rudolph - 2012 - Classical Quarterly 62 (2):496-501.
Mythologies of Vision: Image, Culture, and Visuality.Eduardo Neiva - 1999 - Peter Lang Incorporated, International Academic Publishers.
Neural codes for conscious vision.Dominic H. Ffytche - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (12):493-495.
Is action-guiding vision cognitively impenetrable?Bence Nanay - 2013 - Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-30

Downloads
67 (#243,580)

6 months
41 (#96,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references