The anonymous progymnasmata in John Doxapatres' Homiliae in Aphthonium

Byzantinische Zeitschrift 102 (1):83-94 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines the anonymous progymnasmata in John Doxapatres' commentary on Aphthonius' Progymnasmata for evidence about their authorship, origin, and relations to other progymnasmata. These exercises include three chreias, a refutation and confirmation of the myth of Ganymedes, an encomium and invective of Agamemnon, a comparison of the grapevine and olive tree, and an ethopoeia on the deposition of the emperor Michael V Kalaphates. In addition to providing a formal rhetorical analysis of the exercises, the article offers further support for the view of R. F. Hock and E. N. O'Neil that Doxapatres did not compose these exercises and that they all derive from a single collection. In an appendix, it argues that George Pachymeres, in his comparison of the olive tree and grapevine, used the anonymous comparison in Doxapatres and not the four parallel exercises by Ps.-Nicolaus

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Homiliae VI, 1–16. Pseudo-Klemens - 2011 - Kronos - metafizyka, kultura, religia 4 (19).
The Progymnasmata in Imperial Greek Education.Robert J. Penella - 2011 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 105 (1):77-90.
Book Review: Aelius Theon: Progymnasmata. [REVIEW]George Alexander Kennedy - 1998 - American Journal of Philology 119 (3):476-480.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
32 (#512,801)

6 months
4 (#851,472)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references