Response to Collins about 'one point' that is absent from my review of his book

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):112- (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Revisiting the Question.Jonathan S. Marko - 2010 - Philosophy and Theology 22 (1-2):77-104.
Experimental Reproducibility and the Experimenters' Regress.Hans Radder - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:63 - 73.
Reply to Ron Hall’s Review.Jerry H. Gill - 2000 - Tradition and Discovery 27 (3):35-35.
A Note on Conventions and Unvoiced Syntax.Michael Devitt - 2008 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):241-247.
On interactional expertise: Pragmatic and ontological considerations.Evan Selinger & John Mix - 2004 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (2):145-163.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
33 (#487,172)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Everything you did not necessarily want to know about gravitational waves. And why.Yves Gingras - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):268-282.
Response to one point in Gingras’s review of Gravity’s shadow.Harry Collins - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):151-153.

Add more references