A historical comment concerning novel confirmation

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (2):184-185 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theoretical functions, theory and evidence.John Forge - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (3):443-463.
The paradox of confirmation.Branden Fitelson - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (1):95–113.
Testing Times: Confirmation in the Historical Sciences.Ben Jeffares - 2008 - Dissertation, Australian National University
From relative confirmation to real confirmation.Aron Edidin - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):265-271.
Comment on the French Liberal School.Joseph T. Salerno - 1978 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 2 (1):65-68.
Choosing between confirmation theories.R. G. Swinburne - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (4):602-613.
What Is the Point of Confirmation?Franz Huber - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1146-1159.
Logical versus historical theories of confirmation.Alan Musgrave - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):1-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
166 (#117,085)

6 months
21 (#128,384)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Objective Knowledge.K. R. Popper - 1972 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 4 (2):388-398.
Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (I).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95-123.
Probability and the Weighing of Evidence.I. J. Good - 1950 - Philosophy 26 (97):163-164.
Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (II).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):223-262.

View all 7 references / Add more references