Patriarchy's Language; Naming our Species

Abstract

Paper 1 The argument is made that the names made to be used by our species as its identity fall short of being a theory. Up to the present it was assumed that the names were based on a theory. No one questioned this situation before.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein on Proper Names.Bernd Peter Ottokar Frohmann - 1982 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Referencia vlastných mien (II): Revízia historickej teórie.Marián Zouhar - 2002 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 9 (4):385-405.
Canonical naming systems.Leon Horsten - 2004 - Minds and Machines 15 (2):229-257.
On the linguistic complexity of proper names.Ora Matushansky - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (5):573-627.
Beyond formalism: naming and necessity for human beings.Jay F. Rosenberg - 1994 - Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Was Searle's Descriptivism Refuted?Karen Green - 1998 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):109-13.
Referencia vlastných mien (I): Kritika historickej teórie1.Marián Zouhar - 2002 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 9 (3):272-293.
Naming, and Naming God.Jerome I. Gellman - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (2):193 - 216.
The Naming of Things.Joan Maloof - 2008 - Environmental Philosophy 5 (2):17-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-24

Downloads
190 (#105,162)

6 months
56 (#83,448)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references