Where Do Sounds Fit Within Informal Logic?

Informal Logic 38 (3):362-368 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In response to commentaries by Eckstein and Kišiček, I argue that the study of auditory arguments is very much in keeping with the critical thinking ideals that motivate informal logic. In the process I support further research on sound figures and the meaning of sound that would enhance our ability to analyze auditory arguments.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Groarke : Figuring Sound.Justin Eckstein - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (3):341-345.
How Philosophical is Informal Logic?John Woods - 2000 - Informal Logic 20 (2).
Johnson and the Soundness Doctrine.David Botting - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (4):501-525.
Managing Informal Mathematical Knowledge: Techniques from Informal Logic.Andrew Aberdein - 2006 - Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 4108:208--221.
Making Sense of “Informal Logic”.Ralph H. Johnson - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (3):231-258.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-18

Downloads
13 (#1,041,664)

6 months
4 (#798,384)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leo Groarke
Trent University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references