Ḥikmah pedagogy and students’ thinking and reasoning abilities

Intellectual Discourse 22 (2) (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This research drew on the authors’ long experience in the implementation of the “_Hikmah_ Pedagogy” which is based on the Philosophy for Children’s teaching method. Specifically, the study examined the influence of the pedagogy on the participants’ perceptions of and feelings about their thinking and reasoning skills. The sample comprised 188 Malaysian and international students from an international secondary school in Malaysia. This consisted of students in four Grade levels, ranging from Grades 7 to 10. An instrument named “_Hikmah_ Feedback Survey - HFS” was employed for data collection. The findings were supportive of the positive influence of the pedagogy on students’ abilities to think and reason better after experiencing the programme. Furthermore, the participants demonstrated a considerable improvement in their cognitive and social-communicative skills, as evidenced in the scores obtained for the post-programme’s test. This affirms the fact that the _ḥikmah_ pedagogy is highly recommended in Malaysia’s march towards its Vision 2020 developmental goals. Implications of the study were discussed and suggestions were proposed to educators and stakeholders in secondary school education.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Heidegger's Hermeneutic Method in Tertiary Education.Robert Keith Shaw - 2011 - In Fowler Pip, Strongman Luke & Kobeleva Polly (eds.), Writing the Future. Tertiary Writing Network.
Transforming Our Students: Teaching Business Ethics Post-Enron.Daryl Koehn - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (1):137-151.
Critical Thinking and the Pedagogy of Music Theory.Michael Lively - 2015 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 30 (3):59-68.
When win-argument pedagogy is a loss for the composition classroom.Grosskopf Wendy Lee - 2015 - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 5 (1):243-266.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-16

Downloads
13 (#1,039,612)

6 months
6 (#526,916)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rosnani Hashim
International Islamic University of Malaysia (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thinking in Education.Matthew Lipman - 1992 - British Journal of Educational Studies 40 (2):187-189.
Philosophy in the classroom.Matthew Lipman - 1980 - Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Edited by Ann Margaret Sharp & Frederick S. Oscanyan.
Thinking in Education.Matthew Lipman - 2003 - British Journal of Educational Studies 51 (3):303-305.
Philosophy in the Classroom.Matthew Lipman, Ann Margaret Sharp & Frederick S. Oscanyan - 1977 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 51 (2):213-214.

View all 9 references / Add more references