Non-Euclidean geometry and relative consistency proofs

In Peter K. Machamer & Robert G. Turnbull (eds.), Motion and Time, Space and Matter. Ohio State University Press (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the philosophical significance of consistency proofs.Michael D. Resnik - 1974 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 (1/2):133 - 147.
The Bifurcation Approach to Hyperbolic Geometry.Abraham A. Ungar - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (8):1257-1282.
The theory‐ladenness of observations, the role of scientific instruments, and the Kantiana priori.Ragnar Fjelland - 1991 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (3):269 – 280.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alan Hausman
Hunter College (CUNY)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references