Semiocide as Negation: Review of Michael Marder’s Dump Philosophy [Book Review]

Biosemiotics 17 (1):233-255 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This review admires Michael Marder’s inquiry as a parallel for which biosemiotics can find points of conceptual resonance, even as methodological differences remain. By looking at the dump of ungrounded semiosis – the semiotics of dislocating referents from objects, and its effects – we can better do the work of applying biosemiotics not just towards the wonders of living relations, but also to the manifold ways in which industrial civilization is haphazardly yet systematically destroying the possibility for spontaneous yet contextualized semiogenesis. Biosemiotics has much to gain by understanding the ways, gross and subtle, in which Anthropocenic hubris undercuts our own ability to make sense of the world, doubling down on overconfidence at the expense of meaning-making.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hermeneutics by the Living.Anton Markoš - 2011 - Biosemiotics 4 (2):119-125.
Embracing the Biosemiotic Perspective.Bruce H. Weber - 2009 - Biosemiotics 2 (3):367-375.
What is Biosemiotics?Marcello Barbieri - 2008 - Biosemiotics 1 (1):1-3.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-25

Downloads
5 (#1,537,892)

6 months
5 (#632,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yogi Hendlin
Erasmus University Rotterdam

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Homo sacer.Giorgio Agamben - 1998 - Problemi 1.
Beyond Good and Evil.Friedrich Nietzsche & Helen Zimmern - 1908 - International Journal of Ethics 18 (4):517-518.
Pathmarks.Frederick A. Olafson - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (2):299-302.

View all 18 references / Add more references