Ghost in the Shell 2 , Technicity and the Subject

Film-Philosophy 17 (1):51-67 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This discussion examines how Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence questions what remains of being human and the assemblage of humanity when the human and the machine collide and elide their limit of differentiation. It will be shown how the film's predilection for technology in its narrative content and technological rationalism in its wider conceptual embedding reconstructs humanity but rejects the metaphysical valuation of humanity through notions of dignity, taboo, respect, affect, and so forth. By connecting this twin problematic of ontological difference and metaphysical poverty to the ontological philosophy of Martin Heidegger and psychoanalytic philosophy of Slavoj Žižek, this paper aims to unearth and lay bare the paradoxes inherent in the view of technology and society deployed by Innocence and how the film is able to, in the presence of these explicitly ontological paradoxes, put the question of what constitutes a human Subject into crisis by coding it as a symptom

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond Ghost in the (Human) Shell.Austin Corbett - 2008 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 20 (1):43-50.
That obscure object of psychoanalysis.Dany Nobus - 2013 - Continental Philosophy Review 46 (2):163-187.
Lacan’s subversion of the subject.Ed Pluth - 2006 - Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):293-312.
Jacques Derrida's Ghostface.Laurence Simmons - 2011 - Angelaki 16 (1):129 - 141.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-13

Downloads
68 (#240,692)

6 months
23 (#120,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Parallax View.Slavoj Žižek - 2004 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):255-269.

View all 6 references / Add more references