A Defense of Limited Regulation of Human Genetic Therapies

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (1):112-120 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract:There is a role for regulatory oversight over new genetic technologies. Research must ensure the rights of human subjects, and all medical products and techniques should be ensured to be safe and effective. In the United States, these forms of regulation are largely the purview of the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration. Some have argued, however, that human genetic therapies require new regulatory agencies empowered to enforce cultural norms, protect against hypothetical social harms, or ensure that the human genome remains unchanged. Focusing on the United States, this essay will briefly review these arguments and argue that the current limited regulatory role over human gene therapies is sufficient to protect public health, bodily autonomy, and reproductive freedom.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Genes and equality.Colin Farrelly - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):587-592.
Gene Therapies and the Pursuit of a Better Human.Sara Goering - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (3):330-341.
Genetic Justice Must Track Genetic Complexity.Colin Farrelly - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (1):45-53.
Genetic testing: a conceptual exploration.R. L. Zimmern - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):151-156.
Genetic Health Care Services, Present And Near Future In Japan.Ichiro Matsuda - 2003 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 13 (2):57-58.
New technologies and human rights.Thérèse Murphy (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Maintaining the Somatic/Germ-Line Distinction: Some Ethical Drawbacks.Ray Moseley - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (6):641-647.
Is regulation of human cloning necessary?Alejo Sánchez-Vivar - 2004 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 10 (2):69-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-21

Downloads
19 (#800,123)

6 months
4 (#792,011)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James J. Hughes
University of Massachusetts, Boston

Citations of this work

Moving Beyond ‘Therapy’ and ‘Enhancement’ in the Ethics of Gene Editing.Bryan Cwik - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (4):695-707.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references