A Scientist's Vision Of Art A Review Of Margaret Livingstone's Vision And Art: The Biology Of Seeing [Book Review]

PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 9 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Vision and Art: The Biology of Seeing by Margaret Livingstone is reviewed. Livingstone's analysis balances genes and experiences in proposing explanations that illustrate commonalities between art and visual perception. The book contributes to the literature that applies visual perception research to artwork, although it fails to probe where artistic visual processing might differ from visual processing per se.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defining vision: What homology thinking contributes.Mohan Matthen - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (5):675-689.
Visual stuff and active vision.Wayne Wright - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (2):129-149.
Object Perception: Vision and Audition.Casey O’Callaghan - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):803-829.
Putting the brakes on enactive perception.Jesse J. Prinz - 2006 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 12.
The History of Vision.Bence Nanay - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (3):259-271.
The disunity of color.Mohan Matthen - 1999 - Philosophical Review 108 (1):47-84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
9 (#1,261,065)

6 months
4 (#799,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the Brain.Semir Zeki - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (4):365-366.

Add more references