Das Konsequenzargument

In Rolf W. Puster (ed.), Klassische Argumentationen der Philosophie. pp. 275-296 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper reconstructs causal and theological versions of the consequence argument against the compatibility of free will and determinism and discusses the most influential objections to them.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Van Inwagen’s Consequence Argument.Michael Huemer - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (4):525-544.
Tollensing van Inwagen.Harold W. Noonan - 2014 - Philosophia 42 (4):1055-1061.
So-far incompatibilism and the so-far consequence argument.Stephen Hetherington - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):163-178.
Lehrer and the consequence argument.Danilo Šuster - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (1):77-86.
The core of the consequence argument.Alex Blum - 2003 - Dialectica 57 (4):423-429.
The Consequence Argument.Peter van Inwagen - 2008 - In Peter Van Inwagen & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Metaphysics: The Big Questions. Blackwell.
The Incompatibility of Free Will and Naturalism.Jason Turner - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (4):565-587.
Compatibilism and the consequence argument.Terence Horgan - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 47 (May):339-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-02

Downloads
1,842 (#5,145)

6 months
62 (#76,069)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christoph Jäger
University of Innsbruck

Citations of this work

Willensfreiheit.Geert Keil (ed.) - 2017 - Berlin: De Gruyter.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references