Discussion: The non-reducibility of Koopman's theorems of probability in Carnap's system for mc

Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):368 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Carnap gives a definition for a comparative concept of confirmation. For it he uses the notation “MC.” His defined notation is intended to be an explicatum for the explicandum: “the hypothesis h is confirmed by the evidence e equally strongly or more strongly than h′ by e′”.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Carnap and Reichenbach on Probability with Neurath the Winner.Keith Lehrer - 1993 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 1:143-155.
Carnap’s Thought on Inductive Logic.Yusuke Kaneko - 2012 - Philosophy Study 2 (11).
Explication of Inductive Probability.Patrick Maher - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (6):593 - 616.
About Popper-Carnap controversy.Samir Boukhris & Marco Cannone - 2003 - Signos Filosóficos 6:101-114.
About Popper-Carnap controversy.Samir Boukhris & Marco Cannone - 2003 - Signos Filosóficos 6 (11s):101-114.
Probabilities for two properties.Patrick Maher - 2000 - Erkenntnis 52 (1):63-91.
Strong Enumeration Reducibilities.Roland Sh Omanadze & Andrea Sorbi - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (7):869-912.
Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability.Rudolf Carnap & Richard C. Jeffrey (eds.) - 1971 - University of California Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#422,246)

6 months
27 (#111,724)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the comparative concept of confirmation.Rudolf Carnap - 1952 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 (12):311-318.

Add more references