Is the no-minimum claim true? Reply to cullison: Jeff Jordan

Religious Studies 47 (1):125-127 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is the no-minimum claim true? I have argued that it is not. Andrew Cullison contends that my argument fails, since human sentience is variable; while Michael Schrynemakers has contended that the failure is my neglect of vagueness. Both, I argue, are wrong

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s003441251000034x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Is the no-minimum claim true? Reply to Cullison.Jeff Jordan - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (1):125 - 127.
A defence of the no-minimum response to the problem of evil: Andrew cullison.Andrew Cullison - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (1):121-123.
Vagueness and Pointless Evil.Michael Schrynemakers - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:245-254.
Deep and Wide: A Response to Jeff Jordan on Divine Love.Ross Parker - 2013 - Faith and Philosophy 30 (4):444-461.
Is a Jamesian Wager the only safe bet? On Jeff Jordan's new book on Pascal's Wager.Volker Dieringer - 2009 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (2):237-247.
Pascal's wager: pragmatic arguments and belief in God.Jeff Jordan - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Is it all relative?Stephen Law - 2002 - Think 1 (2):69-82.
Is it wrong to discriminate on the basis of homosexuality?Jeff Jordan - 1995 - Journal of Social Philosophy 26 (1):39-52.
On the mind dependence of truth.Diego Marconi - 2006 - Erkenntnis 65 (3):301 - 318.
Duff and the Wager.Jeff Jordan - 1991 - Analysis 51 (3):174 - 176.
Dr. Jordan and Spencer's unknowable: Reply.E. Jordan - 1912 - Philosophical Review 21 (3):359.
Kenny and religious experience.Jeff Jordan - 1990 - Sophia 29 (3):10-20.
Evil and Van Inwagen.Jeff Jordan - 2003 - Faith and Philosophy 20 (2):236-239.
The doctrine of conservation and free-will defence.Jeff Jordan - 1992 - Sophia 31 (1-2):59-64.
No Title available: Book reviews. [REVIEW]Jeff Jordan - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (2):238-242.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
44 (#363,726)

6 months
8 (#370,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeff Jordan
University of Delaware

Citations of this work

Vagueness and the Problem of Evil: a New Reply to van Inwagen.Luis Oliveira - 2021 - Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 44 (4):49-82.
God and Gratuitous Evil (Part II).Klaas J. Kraay - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (12):913-922.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references