- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (1):47 (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Hypnotic control of attention in the stroop task: A historical footnote.M. C. & W. P. - 2003 - Consciousness and Cognition 12 (3):347-353.
Hypnotic control of attention in the stroop task: A historical footnote.Colin M. MacLeod & Peter W. Sheehan - 2003 - Consciousness and Cognition 12 (3):347-353.
Competing for a desired reward in the stroop task: When attentional control is unconscious but effective versus conscious but ineffective.Pascal Huguet, Florence Dumas & Jean-M. Monteil - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (3):153-167.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-18
Downloads
94 (#184,595)
6 months
6 (#531,855)
2014-03-18
Downloads
94 (#184,595)
6 months
6 (#531,855)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.Nash Unsworth & Randall W. Engle - 2007 - Psychological Review 114 (1):104-132.
Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory.Keith E. Stanovich - 2009 - In Keith Frankish & Jonathan St B. T. Evans (eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press. pp. 55--88.
An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance.Toni Schmader, Michael Johns & Chad Forbes - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (2):336-356.
Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence.Andrew R. A. Conway, Michael J. Kane & Randall W. Engle - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (12):547-552.
References found in this work
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.J. R. Stroop - 1935 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (6):643.
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.George A. Miller - 1956 - Psychological Review 63 (2):81-97.
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.George A. Miller - 1956 - Psychological Review 101 (2):343-352.
On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.Jonathan D. Cohen, Kevin Dunbar & James L. McClelland - 1990 - Psychological Review 97 (3):332-361.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-wqqkk uwo