And Yet the Small-Sample Effect Does Hold: Reply to Juslin and Olsson (2005) and Anderson, Doherty, Berg, and Friedrich (2005) [Book Review]

Psychological Review 112 (1):280-285 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/0033-295x.112.1.280

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Sample Size and the Detection of Correlation--A Signal Detection Account: Comment on Kareev (2000) and Juslin and Olsson (2005). [REVIEW]Richard B. Anderson, Michael E. Doherty, Neil D. Berg & Jeff C. Friedrich - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (1):268-279.
Postscript.Richard B. Anderson, Michael E. Doherty, Neil D. Berg & Jeff C. Friedrich - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (1):279-279.
Exemplar effects in categorization and multiple-cue judgment.Peter Juslin, Henrik Olsson & Anna-Carin Olsson - 2003 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (1):133.
Capacity Limitations and the Detection of Correlations: Comment on Kareev (2000).Peter Juslin & Henrik Olsson - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (1):256-267.
Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: A critical examination of the hard–easy effect.Peter Juslin, Anders Winman & Henrik Olsson - 2000 - Psychological Review 107 (2):384-396.
Postscript.Peter Juslin & Henrik Olsson - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (1):267-267.
Additive integration of information in multiple cue judgment: A division of labor hypothesis.P. Juslin, L. Karlsson & H. Olsson - 2008 - Cognition 106 (1):259-298.
At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Felix D. Schönbrodt & Marco Perugini - unknown
Information integration in multiple cue judgment: A division of labor hypothesis.Peter Juslin, Linnea Karlsson & Henrik Olsson - 2008 - Cognition 106 (1):259-298.
Decision making and memory: A critique of Juslin and Olsson's (1997) sampling model of sensory discrimination.Douglas Vickers & Anthony Pietsch - 2001 - Psychological Review 108 (4):789-804.
Thurstonian and Brunswikian origins of uncertainty in judgment: A sampling model of confidence in sensory discrimination.Peter Juslin & Henrik Olsson - 1997 - Psychological Review 104 (2):344-366.
Visual perception of dynamic properties: Cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence.Sverker Runeson, Peter Juslin & Henrik Olsson - 2000 - Psychological Review 107 (3):525-555.
Reliability and Future True Belief: Reply to Olsson and Jönsson.Christoph Jäger - 2011 - Theoria 77 (3):223-237.
Gender Comparisons of Mathematics Attitudes and Affect.Janet Shibley Hyde, Elizabeth Fennema, Marilyn Ryan, Laurie A. Frost & Carolyn Hopp - 1990 - Psychology of Women Quarterly 14 (3):299-324.
Kinds of Learning and the Likelihood of Future True Beliefs: Reply to Jäger on Reliabilism and the Value Problem.Erik J. Olsson & Martin Jönsson - 2011 - Theoria 77 (3):214-222.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
15 (#953,911)

6 months
4 (#799,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Experiential Limitation in Judgment and Decision.Ulrike Hahn - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (2):229-244.
Postscript.Richard B. Anderson, Michael E. Doherty, Neil D. Berg & Jeff C. Friedrich - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (1):279-279.
Postscript.Peter Juslin & Henrik Olsson - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (1):267-267.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Positive bias in the perception of covariation.Yaakov Kareev - 1995 - Psychological Review 102 (3):490-502.

View all 7 references / Add more references