Justifying Terrorism: No Dogs or Philosophers Allowed

DVD (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Can the use of terror as a political weapon ever be justified? What are the political implications of the struggle to define the concept of "terrorism"? Was the attack on the USS Cole a terrorist act? What role do the intentions of the terrorist and the state of mind of the victims play? Does the modern concept of the nation-state necessarily require the radical devaluation of the use of terror for political ends? With Robert Rafalko, Philip Devine, and Scott Hibbard

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Domestic Abuse as Terrorism.Jay Sloan-Lynch - 2012 - Hypatia 27 (4):774-790.
Terrorism and the uses of terror.Jeremy Waldron - 2004 - The Journal of Ethics 8 (1):5-35.
Justifying Terrorism.Thom Brooks - 2010 - Public Affairs Quarterly 24 (3):189-196.
Terrorism, Retribution, and Collective Responsibility.Mark R. Reiff - 2008 - Social Theory and Practice 34 (2):209-242.
Terrorism: The Philosophical Issues.Igor Primoratz (ed.) - 2004 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
A Typology of Terrorism.Shawn Kaplan - 2008 - Review Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (1):1-38.
Community and Civil Strife.Paul Gilbert - 1990 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (1):3-13.
Law, text, terror.Ian Ward - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Devine
Providence College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references