Natural evil as a test of faith in the abrahamic traditions

Sophia 49 (1):15-28 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper critically examines what I call the ‘testing theodicy,’ the widely held idea that natural evil exists in order to test our faith in God. This theodicy appears numerous times in the scriptures of all three Abrahamic faiths. After examining some of these scriptural passages, we will argue that in light of these texts, the notion of faith is best understood as some type of commitment such as trust, loyalty or piety, rather than as merely a belief in God’s existence. After carefully showing the form this theodicy must take, I argue that the testing theodicy suffers from serious difficulties and fails to adequately account for the existence of natural evil

Similar books and articles

Does theism need a theodicy?Richard Swinburne - 1988 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):287 - 311.
Is theism capable of accounting for any natural evil at all?Nick Trakakis - 2005 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (1):35 - 66.
Hasker on Gratuitous Natural Evil.David O'Connor - 1995 - Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):380-392.
A philosophy of evil.Lars Fr H. Svendsen - 2010 - Champaign, IL: Dalkey Archive Press.
Is the Problem of Evil a Problem for Descartes?Brett Gaul - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:209-220.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-12-09

Downloads
587 (#30,746)

6 months
287 (#7,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeremy Koons
Georgetown University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Loyalty and virtues.R. E. Ewin - 1992 - Philosophical Quarterly 42 (169):403-419.
Philosophy of religion.Louis P. Pojman (ed.) - 1987 - Mountain View, Calif.: Mayfield.

Add more references