Bildung Versus Assessment

In Ann Chinnery, Nuraan Davids, Naomi Hodgson, Kai Horsthemke, Viktor Johansson, Dirk Willem Postma, Claudia W. Ruitenberg, Paul Smeyers, Christiane Thompson, Joris Vlieghe, Hanan Alexander, Joop Berding, Charles Bingham, Michael Bonnett, David Bridges, Malte Brinkmann, Brian A. Brown, Carsten Bünger, Nicholas C. Burbules, Rita Casale, M. Victoria Costa, Brian Coyne, Renato Huarte Cuéllar, Stefaan E. Cuypers, Johan Dahlbeck, Suzanne de Castell, Doret de Ruyter, Samantha Deane, Sarah J. DesRoches, Eduardo Duarte, Denise Egéa, Penny Enslin, Oren Ergas, Lynn Fendler, Sheron Fraser-Burgess, Norm Friesen, Amanda Fulford, Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, Stefan Herbrechter, Chris Higgins, Pádraig Hogan, Katariina Holma, Liz Jackson, Ronald B. Jacobson, Jennifer Jenson, Kerstin Jergus, Clarence W. Joldersma, Mark E. Jonas, Zdenko Kodelja, Wendy Kohli, Anna Kouppanou, Heikki A. Kovalainen, Lesley Le Grange, David Lewin, Tyson E. Lewis, Gerard Lum, Niclas Månsson, Christopher Martin & Jan Masschelein (eds.), International Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 889-903 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter examines the alleged tension between the notion of Bildung, including its different historical and contemporary varieties, and the contemporary practices of educational assessment. Is there an inherent tension between Bildung and educational assessment? I analyze the ways in which Bildung and assessment seem antithetical to one another, while also showing how the two terms may be reinterpreted so as to make them compatible with one another. To develop my argument, I offer an interpretation of the main strands of the Bildung tradition, with particular emphasis on how they relate to the questions of educational assessment. A concrete example of how Bildung and educational assessment may be harmonized is provided through a case study of the Finnish educational system. To be successful, Bildung must use evaluative elements, and this involves both self-evaluation and evaluating others. Moreover, if educational assessment uses standards that require learning not only knowledge and skills but also attitudes and values, then Bildung ideals will be compatible with the demands of educational assessment.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aversive education: Emersonian variations on ‘Bildung’.Claudia Schumann - 2019 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (5):488-497.
Bildung and Modernity: The Future of Bildung in a World of Difference.Gert Biesta - 2002 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 21 (4/5):343-351.
The Subject‐Object Transformations and ‘Bildung’.Käthe Schneider - 2012 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (3):302-311.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
4 (#1,630,023)

6 months
1 (#1,478,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references