- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Is the “cognitive penetrability” criterion invalidated by contemporary physics?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):303-306 (1982)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The case for cognitive penetrability.Philippe G. Schyns - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):394-395.
An ecological approach to cognitive (im)penetrability.Rob Withagen & Claire F. Michaels - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):399-400.
Circularity, reliability, and the cognitive penetrability of perception.Jack Lyons - 2011 - Philosophical Issues 21 (1):289-311.
Visual Experience: Cognitive Penetrability and Indeterminacy.Alon Chasid - 2014 - Acta Analytica 29 (1):119-130.
Perceiving and Desiring: A New Look at the Cognitive Penetrability of Experience.Dustin Stokes - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (3):479-92.
Better ways to study penetrability with detection theory.Neil A. Macmillan - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):384-384.
Cognitive Penetration and the Reach of Phenomenal Content.Robert Briscoe - 2015 - In Athanassios Raftopoulos & John Zeimbekis (eds.), Cognitive Penetrability. Oxford University Press.
Modular architectures and informational encapsulation: A dilemma.Dustin Stokes & Vincent Bergeron - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (3):315-38.
Cognitive Penetrabiity of Perception: Attention, Strategies and Bottom-Up Constraints.Athanassios Raftopoulos (ed.) - 2005 - New York: Nova Science.
Cognitive Penetrability of Perception: An Interdisciplinary Approach.Athanassios Raftopoulos (ed.) - 2005 - Nova Science.
Posing the problem of the criterion.Andrew D. Cling - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 75 (3):261 - 292.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
36 (#447,143)
6 months
10 (#279,596)
2014-01-20
Downloads
36 (#447,143)
6 months
10 (#279,596)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Direct vs. representational views of cognition: A parallel between vision and phonology.Samuel Jay Keyser & Steven Pinker - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):389-390.
Difficulties with a direct theory of perception.Irvin Rock - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):398-399.
Abstract machine theory and direct perception.Robert Shaw & James Todd - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):400-401.
Direct perception or adaptive resonance?Stephen Grossberg - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):385-386.
References found in this work
Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology.Jerry A. Fodor - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):63-73.
Computation and cognition: Issues in the foundation of cognitive science.Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):111-32.
Knowing and the known.John Dewey - 1960 - Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. Edited by Arthur Fisher Bentley.
Knowing and the Known.Max Black, John Dewey & Arthur J. Bentley - 1950 - Philosophical Review 59 (2):269.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-dmxst uwo