Aristotle on his three elements: a reading of Aristotle's own doctrine

Abstract

In light of the long-lived, on-going debate surrounding the Aristotelian doctrines of prime matter and the four simple bodies (or 'elements'), the general message of this thesis is surprising: that Aristotle's theory is centred on neither. I argue that Aristotle does in fact have a substantial prime matter, but not the single, featureless, immutable prime matter of tradition

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Prime matter and actuality.Christopher Byrne - 1995 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (2):197-224.
Prime Matter and Extension in Aristotle.Paul Studtmann - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Research 31:171-184.
Aristotle.J. M. E. Moravcsik - 1967 - Garden City, N.Y.,: Anchor Books.
The Holistic Presuppositions of Aristotle's Cosmology.Mohan Matthen - 2001 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 20:171-199.
Aristotle's Motivation for Matter.David Ebrey - 2007 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-18

Downloads
37 (#434,087)

6 months
1 (#1,478,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alistair M. Kwan
University of Auckland

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references