The eagle and the starlings: Galileo’s argument for the autonomy of science—how pertinent is it today?

&
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):122-131 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.10.012

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Cambridge Companion to Galileo (JR Milton).P. Machamer - 2000 - Philosophical Books 41 (1):29-30.
The Cambridge Companion to Galileo.Peter Machamer (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
Science meets biblical exegesis in the Galileo affair.Sj George V. Coyne - 2013 - Zygon 48 (1):221-229.
The Character of Galilean Evidence.Joseph C. Pitt - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:125 - 134.
Galileo, rationality and explanation.Joseph C. Pitt - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (1):87-103.
Galileo Heretic.Joseph C. Pitt - 1987
Stich, Content, Prediction, and Explanation in Cognitive Science.Charles Wallis - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:327 - 340.
Raz on the Right to Autonomy.Nicole Hassoun - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):96-109.
Galileo's Mistake: A New Look at the Epic Confrontation Between Galileo and the Church.Allen Thomas & Wade Rowland - 2003 - Arcade Publishing.
Welfare, Autonomy, and the Autonomy Fallacy.Dale Dorsey - 2015 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (2):141-164.
Truth and Value Today: Galileo contra Bellarmine.Karsten Harries - 2004 - Filozofski Vestnik 25 (2).
Mechanics Lost: Husserl’s Galileo and Ihde’s Telescope.Harald A. Wiltsche - 2017 - Husserl Studies 33 (2):149-173.
Galileo’s Legacy.Dominic J. Balestra - 2011 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:1-14.
Which forms of limitation of the autonomy of science are epistemologically acceptable ?Stephanie Ruphy - unknown
Galileo as a ‘bad theologian’: a formative myth about Galileo’s trial.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (4):753-791.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-18

Downloads
61 (#265,263)

6 months
4 (#798,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Hugh Lacey
Swarthmore College
Pablo Mariconda
University of São Paulo

Citations of this work

A new direction for science and values.Daniel J. Hicks - 2014 - Synthese 191 (14):3271-95.
Roles for Values in Scientific Activities.Hugh Lacey - 2018 - Axiomathes 28 (6):603-618.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dialogue concerning the Two Chief World Systems.Galileo Galilei & Stillman Drake - 1954 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5 (19):253-256.
Scientific freedom: its grounds and their limitations.Torsten Wilholt - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2):174-181.

View all 6 references / Add more references