Perception and Objective Being: Peter Auriol on Perceptual Acts and their Objects

American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90 (1):49-76 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article discusses the theory of perception of Peter Auriol. Arguing for the active nature of the senses in perception, Auriol applies the Scotistic doctrine of objective being to the theory of perception. Nevertheless, he still accepts some parts of the theory of species. The paper introduces Auriol's view on the mechanism of perception and his account of illusions. I argue for a direct realist reading of Auriol's theory of perception and propose that his position becomes clearer if we use the distinction between the first- and third-person perspectives which he seems to presuppose.

Similar books and articles

Perceptual Phenomenology and Direct Realism.Caleb Liang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 42:103-148.
Representing the impossible.Jennifer Matey - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (2):188 - 206.
Against Treating Introspection as Perception-Like.Renee Smith - 2010 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 16 (1):79-86.
The Role of Object-Dependent Singular Thought in Visual Cognition.Gregory David Gilson - 1998 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Thomas Reid on acquired perception.Rebecca Copenhaver - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):285-312.
Perception and Intention.Matthew Hopkins Berry - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of Connecticut

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-20

Downloads
756 (#21,382)

6 months
139 (#26,665)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lukas Licka
Czech Academy of Sciences

Citations of this work

Peter auriol.Russell L. Friedman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Peter Aureoli and William of Ockham on Relations.Mark Henninger - 1985 - Franciscan Studies 45 (1):231-243.
Implicit Knowledge.W. Goris - 2002 - Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 69 (1):33-65.

Add more references