Public Health England and Co-Production with the Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme

The New Bioethics 29 (3):216-225 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As the new Cell-free DNA (Cf-DNA) prenatal screening test for Down syndrome was being introduced into the UK’s fetal anomaly screening program, Down syndrome charities had an opportunity to participate. An experience of co-production where we were the minority voice then followed. This paper explores that process and our experience as a charity. Institutional and societal structures meant that it was difficult to be heard and a significant amount of bias was noted within the program. Consequently, our viewpoints were often considered and then dismissed. However, at times we were listened to, and feel that there were some valuable changes made resulting from our involvement. The end product was far from reflective of all that we stand for, and there are still lessons to be learned in England about the need to place a higher value on minority voices of lived experience in a co-production exercise.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The public must decide whether genetic screening is ethical.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):62-62.
Essentials of public health ethics.Ruth Gaare Bernheim - 2015 - Burlington, Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning. Edited by James F. Childress, Richard J. Bonnie & Alan L. Melnick.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-23

Downloads
6 (#1,464,567)

6 months
3 (#982,484)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references