Empirical Adequacy in the Received View

Philosophy of Science 81 (5):1171-1183 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I show that the central notion of Constructive Empiricism, empirical adequacy, can be expressed syntactically and specifically in the Received View of the logical empiricists. The formalization shows that the Received View is superior to Constructive Empiricism in the treatment of theories involving constants or functions from observable to unobservable objects. It also suggests a formalization of ‘full empirical informativeness’ in Constructive Empiricism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Contra Ladyman: What really is right with constructive empiricism.Joseph F. Hanna - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):767-777.
The image of observables.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):585-597.
The pragmatics of empirical adequacy.Bryson Brown - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (2):242 – 264.
How not to defend constructive empiricism: A rejoinder.Stathis Psillos - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (188):369-372.
On rejecting Foss's image of Van Fraassen.Warren Bourgeois - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (2):303-308.
On the Empirical Adequacy of Composite Statistical Hypotheses.Joseph F. Hanna - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:73-80.
Constructive Empiricism and Deflationary Truth.Jamin Asay - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (4):423-443.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-07-09

Downloads
163 (#117,966)

6 months
12 (#214,382)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sebastian Lutz
Uppsala University

Citations of this work

Sophistication about Symmetries.Neil Dewar - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (2):485-521.
What Was the Syntax‐Semantics Debate in the Philosophy of Science About?Sebastian Lutz - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95 (2):319-352.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Laws and symmetry.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 2008 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
The Empirical Stance.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 2004 - New York: Yale University Press.
Laws and Symmetry.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 1989 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 182 (3):327-329.

View all 41 references / Add more references