Transcultural and Transnational Communication Principles? Suggestions for Minimum and Maximum Values as a Common Ground

Journal of Media Ethics 39 (2):85-98 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Based on the communication ethics of Ptahhotep and other inclusivist communication value systems, including several additional non-Western (Confucian, Buddhist, Aborigine, Cree, San, Māori, Ubuntu, and Islamic) as well as Western ones (Stoic, Christian, Kantian, socialist, liberal, and journalistic), we propose seven principles as common ground for the future regulation of media communication on a global scale. All seven are formulated in a manner similar to Ptahhotep’s, providing a flexible range of norms allowing, for example, hate speech to be dealt with by criminalization, or in civil law, or by means of ethics rules and self-regulation, depending on the severity of the involved threats to humanity, to human beings, or to other core values. We reject an often-paralyzing comparative intercultural juxtaposition of individualism versus collectivism, instead suggesting an inclusivist and interculturally principled common ground for the regulation of communication.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The moral authority of transnational corporate codes.William C. Frederick - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (3):165 - 177.
The Numerical Syllogism and Existential Presupposition.Wallace A. Murphree - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (1):49-64.
Transnational Rule of Law, coercion, and human action.Julieta A. Rabanos - 2022 - Revus. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law / Revija Za Ustavno Teorijo in Filozofijo Prava 47.
Globalization and Social Justice: The Right to Minimum Wage.Hani Ofek-Ghendler - 2009 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 3 (2):267-300.
The Democratic Minimum: Is Democracy a Means to Global Justice?James Bohman - 2005 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):101-116.
When Lingens meets Frege: communication without common ground.Jens Kipper - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (5):1441-1461.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-26

Downloads
8 (#1,334,002)

6 months
8 (#399,931)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The moral problem.Michael Smith - 1994 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten.Immanuel Kant - 1785 - Stuttgart,: P. Reclam. Edited by Theodor Valentiner.
The Open Society and its Complexities.Gerald F. Gaus - 2021 - New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Kuhn - 2009 - In Michael Ruse (ed.), Philosophy After Darwin: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Princeton University Press. pp. 176-177.
Cosmopolitanism: ideals and realities.David Held - 2010 - Malden, MA: Polity Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references