Neo-logicism and Conservativeness

Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Neo-logicists have claimed that Hume's Principle (HP) may be taken as a stipulative definition of cardinal number. This claim is threatened by the fact that HP is not conservative over pure second-order logic. I argue that the dominant neo-logicist response to the conservativeness objection is not satisfactory. Then I propose a novel version of neo-logicism, based on Heck's Two-sorted Hume's Principle (2HP), which does meet the conservativeness objection—provided that conservativeness is understood semantically and not deductively. I also argue that on my proposal, the Bad Company problem is solved by conservativeness.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two-Sorted Frege Arithmetic is Not Conservative.Stephen Mackereth & Jeremy Avigad - 2022 - Review of Symbolic Logic 16 (4):1199-1232.
Conservativeness, Stability, and Abstraction.Roy T. Cook - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):673-696.
Deflationism, conservativeness and maximality.Cezary Cieśliński - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (6):695 - 705.
Logicism and the Meanings of Logical Constants. 박준용 - 2016 - Journal of the New Korean Philosophical Association 84:177-207.
Neo-Logicism and Its Logic.Panu Raatikainen - 2020 - History and Philosophy of Logic 41 (1):82-95.
The logic in logicism.Alexander Bird - 1997 - Dialogue 36 (2):341--60.
Logicism Revisited.Otávio Bueno - 2001 - Principia 5 (1-2):99-124.
Logicism Reconsidered.Patricia A. Blanchette - 1990 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Deflationism beyond arithmetic.Kentaro Fujimoto - 2019 - Synthese 196 (3):1045-1069.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-19

Downloads
15 (#951,094)

6 months
15 (#170,787)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Mackereth
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Tonk, Plonk and Plink.Nuel Belnap - 1962 - Analysis 22 (6):130-134.
The philosopher behind the last logicist.Joan Weiner - 1984 - Philosophical Quarterly 34 (136):242-264.

Add more references