Neuroscience, learning and the return to behaviorism

In John Bickle (ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy and neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 166--178 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can Cognitive Neuroscience Ground a Science of Learning?Anthony E. Kelly - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):17-23.
Does neuroscience matter for education?Francis Schrag - 2011 - Educational Theory 61 (2):221-237.
Behaviorism, constructivism, and socratic pedagogy.Peter Boghossian - 2006 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (6):713–722.
Contrasting approaches to a theory of learning.Timothy D. Johnston - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (1):125-139.
Behaviorism: a conceptual reconstruction.G. E. Zuriff - 1985 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Teleological behaviorism and the intentional scheme.Hugh Lacey - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):134-135.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Machamer
University of Pittsburgh

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references