The relativity of simultaneity is not a temporal illusion: a critique of Brogaard and Marlow

Analysis 74 (2):234-236 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent issue of this journal Berit Brogaard and Kristian Marlow claim that an absolute frame of reference is compatible with Einstein’s Special Relativity. To achieve this they tweak Einstein’s famous train and embankment thought experiment and unjustifiably attribute, to Einstein, Hans Reichenbach’s claim that cause and effect are always temporally separated. Their conclusion is incompatible with the proper Lorentz transformations to show how time dilates from one frame of reference to another; transformations they show no evidence of having done. I refute their conclusion by doing the calculations

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hearing colours.Berit Brogaard & Kristian Marlow - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 63:28-35.
Einstein's theory of relativity.Max Born - 1924 - New York,: Dover Publications. Edited by Henry Herman Leopold Adolf Brose.
On Writing the History of Special Relativity.John Earman, Clark Glymour & Robert Rynasiewicz - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:403 - 416.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-01

Downloads
100 (#174,771)

6 months
17 (#151,744)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dylan Manson
University of California, Los Angeles