A Few Thoughts on the Possibility of Intercultural Thinking in a Global Age

Philosophy East and West 70 (1):238-246 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Until recently, most humanities scholars in North America and Europe lived in a world where China was notable for its absence. In the great debates of the 1990s and early 2000s on postmodernism, the end of history, the legacy of Marxism, and the future of liberalism, no Chinese contributions were heard, nor were they in the more recent debates on the relationship between Islam and the West, the post-secular age, genetic engineering, the digital age, or Speculative Realism. Only most recently, with the changed geopolitical situation, are Chinese thinkers starting to receive more attention. In this context, Eric S. Nelson’s book Chinese and Buddhist Philosophy in Early Twentieth-Century...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

“Let Chinese Thinking Be Chinese, not Western”: Sine Qua Non to Globalization.Wu Kuang-Ming - 2010 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (2):193-209.
Body Thinking: From Chinese to Global.Kuang-Ming Wu - 2012 - Open Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):153-164.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-21

Downloads
6 (#1,467,364)

6 months
1 (#1,478,912)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references