The Therapeutic “Mis”conception: An Examination of its Normative Assumptions and a Call for its Revision

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27 (1):154-162 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dissecting Bioethics, edited by Tuija Takala and Matti Hayry, welcomes contributions on the conceptual and theoretical dimensions of bioethics. The department is dedicated to the idea that words defined by bioethicists and others should not be allowed to imprison people’s actual concerns, emotions, and thoughts. Papers that expose the many meanings of a concept, describe the different readings of a moral doctrine, or provide an alternative angle to seemingly self-evident issues are particularly appreciated. To submit a paper or to discuss a suitable topic, contact Tuija Takala [email protected].:This article examines some of the assumptions and implications associated with the Belmont era context in which the concept of therapeutic misconception was forged. We argue that the justification of therapeutic misconception should be reconsidered based on less paternalistic and more participatory models of research. Finally, we identify conceptual and practical approaches that might better reflect contemporary research practice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The metaethicists' mistake.Ralph Wedgwood - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):405–426.
Unity of Reasons.Adam Cureton - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (4):877-895.
Hegel's Therapeutic Conception of Philosophy.Paul Giladi - 2015 - Hegel Bulletin (Special Issue on Idealism and Pragmatism) 36 (02): 248-267.
A Critique of Social Control in Cross-Cultural Studies.Su-li Zhu - 1992 - Dissertation, Arizona State University
A framework for iterated revision.Sébastien Konieczny & Ramón Pino Pérez - 2000 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 10 (3-4):339-367.
Is stakeholder theory really ethical?Okechukwu Enyinna - 2013 - African Journal of Business Ethics 7 (2):79.
Is stakeholder theory really ethical?Enyinna Okechukwu - 2013 - African Journal of Business Ethics 7 (2):79-86.
Revisionary dispositionalism and practical reason.H. Lillehammer - 2000 - The Journal of Ethics 4 (3):173-190.
Has Therapy Intruded into Education?Avi Mintz - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (4):633-647.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-18

Downloads
30 (#547,532)

6 months
12 (#242,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Fins
Cornell University