Time and the Physical Modalities

The Monist 53 (3):426-446 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Relative to any point in time, how many possible futures are there? For example, it may rain tomorrow, or again it may not. So it would appear that relative to today, there are at least two possible futures, one involving rain tomorrow and the other not. Of course only one of these two future states of affairs will take place, and in that sense there is only one actual future, though there may be many possible futures. The only hypothesis under which there is, for every instant in time, only one possible future, is the hypothesis of universal Laplacean determinism, and this hypothesis has had little to recommend it since the advent of quantum physics. Furthermore, although among the many possible futures relative to any given moment in time there is only one which will become actual, no distinguishing mark separates this one from its fellows at the given moment. So it would appear that what confronts the world at each moment in time is an undifferentiated multiplicity of possible futures. But this multiplicity, though at first sight admittedly frightening in its implications, may be put to good philosophical use: as will be seen it yields natural and convincing definitions of the notions of physical necessity and possibility. On the other hand, alternative definitions of these notions are obtainable which do not make use of the manifold of possible futures, and these also will be presented. The paper will be in two parts, the first dealing with the concepts of physical possibility and necessity, and the second presenting a formal calculus of necessary and sufficient conditions in which the physical modalities find their place.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Logical necessity, physical necessity, ethics, and quantifiers.Richard Montague - 1960 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 3 (1-4):259 – 269.
God, Modalities, and Conceptualism.Amy Karofsky - 2003 - Philosophy and Theology 15 (2):257-271.
On the space-time ontology of physical theories.Kenneth L. Manders - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (4):575-590.
“Becoming” and the Asymmetries of Time.Yehudah Freundlich - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (4):496-517.
Active Perception and the Representation of Space.Mohan Matthen - 2014 - In Dustin Stokes, Mohan Matthen & Stephen Biggs (eds.), Perception and Its Modalities. Oxford University Press. pp. 44-72.
A Note on the Physical Possibility of Transfinite Computation.Wayne Aitken & Jeffrey A. Barrett - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (4):867-874.
Time in physics.Craig Callender - 2005 - In Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Macmillan Reference USA.
Purely physical modalities.John Bacon - 1981 - Theoria 47 (3):134-141.
Physical entropy and the senses.Kenneth H. Norwich - 2005 - Acta Biotheoretica 53 (3):167-180.
'Might' Made Right.Kai von Fintel & Anthony S. Gillies - 2011 - In Andy Egan & Brian Weatherson (eds.), Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press. pp. 108–130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
73 (#227,669)

6 months
4 (#799,214)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Storrs McCall
McGill University

Citations of this work

Objective time flow.Storrs McCall - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (3):337-362.
Timeless Truth.Andrea Iacona - 2013 - In Fabrice Correia & Andrea Iacona (eds.), Around the Tree. Springer.
Boethius' thesis and conditional logic.Claudio Pizzi - 1977 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):283 - 302.
Explicating lawhood.Peter Vallentyne - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):598-613.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references