Anton Günther’s critique of pantheism as introduction to his philosophy of revelation

Intellectual History Review 34 (1):185-202 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ingenious thought of Anton Günther (1783–1863) is rarely mentioned in the annals of nineteenth-century philosophy. However, in the eyes of his contemporaries, Günther belonged to the key thinkers of his age on par with Kant, Fichte, Hegel, and Schelling. Günther was an original writer yet he left many of his insights undeveloped or ambiguously formulated. As a flamboyant and popular debater, he attacked the most influential philosophers of his time. His attacks were aimed especially at what he termed the unavoidable pantheism of these thinkers, a pantheism Günther often identified with monism. Monism, semi-monism, pantheism, and semi-pantheism are recurring charges of Günther against many influential thinkers, including even Descartes, whose thought Günther considered otherwise epoch-making. Based on a reformed Cartesianism, Günther elaborated his antidote he termed dualism. Yet Güntherian dualism turns out to be a synthesis properly termed organicism. On such a basis, Günther carried out a heroic attempt to transcend the horizon of traditional views and open the vista of an I-centered philosophy built on the universal notion of revelation. By re-reading this Bohemia-born thinker, one can have a better understanding of the scope and influence of what we term Austrian Philosophy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pantheism.Michael Levine - 2010 - In Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper & Philip L. Quinn (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 337–347.
Two Models of Radical Revelation in Austrian Philosophy.Balazs Mezei - 2009 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (1):99 - 120.
Pantheism vs. Theism.Lewis S. Ford - 1997 - The Monist 80 (2):286-306.
Pantheism vs. Theism: A Re-appraisal.Lewis S. Ford - 1997 - The Monist 80 (2):286 - 306.
Pantheism: A Rapid Introduction.John Leslie - 2007 - In Immortality Defended. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 1–15.
Platonic Polypsychic Pantheism.Mary Lenzi - 1997 - The Monist 80 (2):232-250.
Hegel’s God.Peter C. Hodgson - 2005 - The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):153-163.
Hegel’s God.Peter C. Hodgson - 2005 - The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):153-163.
The Question of Pantheism in the Second Objections to Descartes’s Meditations.Julie R. Klein - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (3):357-379.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-01

Downloads
18 (#836,872)

6 months
18 (#144,337)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkte.F. Brentano - 1876 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 1:209-213.
Phenomenology as Philosophy of Revelation.Balázs M. Mezei - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (3):139-166.

Add more references