Reply: A bet with Peacocke

In C. Macdonald (ed.), Philosophy of Psychology: Debates on Psychological Explanation. Cambridge: Blackwell (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Concepts, conceptions, reflective understanding: Reply to Peacocke.Tyler Burge - 2003 - In Martin Hahn & B. Ramberg (eds.), Reflections and Replies: Essays on the Philosophy of Tyler Burge. MIT Press.
Possessing concepts: Christopher Peacocke's a study of concepts. [REVIEW]Alan Millar - 1994 - Mind 103 (409):73-82.
The non-circularity constraint: Peacocke vs. Peacocke. L. - 2003 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-2):85-93.
Demonstrative content: A reply to John McDowell.Christopher Peacocke - 1991 - Mind 100 (1):123-133.
The Emperor’s New Concepts.Neil Tennant - 2002 - Noûs 36 (s16):345-377.
Reply to Humphreys, Quinlan, Higginbotham, Schiffer and Soames's comments on Peacocke's Explanation in Computational Psychology.Christopher Peacocke - 1986 - Mind and Language 1 (4):388-402.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1 (#1,903,443)

6 months
1 (#1,475,915)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ruth Millikan
University of Connecticut

Citations of this work

Consumers Need Information: supplementing teleosemantics with an input condition.Nicholas Shea - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):404-435.
Can Teleosemantics Deflect the EAAN?Brian Leahy - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (1):221-238.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references