Sin sectors and negative screening

Business Ethics: A European Review 30 (2):216-230 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Business Ethics: A European Review, Volume 30, Issue 2, Page 216-230, April 2021.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/beer.12331

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Justifying the Expansion of Neonatal Screening: Two Cases.Niklas Juth - 2019 - Public Health Ethics 12 (3):250-260.
Australian Socially Responsible Funds: Performance, Risk and Screening Intensity. [REVIEW]Jacquelyn E. Humphrey & Darren D. Lee - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (4):519-535.
The Opportunity Cost of Negative Screening in Socially Responsible Investing.Pieter Jan Trinks & Bert Scholtens - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 140 (2):193-208.
Transitivity and Partial Screening Off.David Atkinson & Jeanne Peijnenburg - 2012 - Theoria 79 (4):294-308.
Screening for multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: what is effective and justifiable?Christina Åhrén, Anna Lindblom, Christian Munthe & Niels Nijsingh - 2020 - Monash Bioethics Review 38 (Suppl 1):72-90.
Toward a Unified Framework of Perceived Negative Leader Behaviors Insights from French and British Educational Sectors.Taran Patel & Robert G. Hamlin - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 145 (1):157-182.
Screening Children for Caries: An Ethical Dilemma in Nigeria.Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan, Bridget Gabriella Haire, Abiola A. Adeniyi & Wasiu Lanre Adeyemo - 2018 - The New Bioethics 24 (2):135-149.
Antenatal screening and its possible meaning from unborn baby's perspective.Sahin Aksoy - 2001 - BMC Medical Ethics 2 (1):1-11.
Pre-employment genetic screening.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):420-420.
Correction to: The Opportunity Cost of Negative Screening in Socially Responsible Investing.Pieter Jan Trinks & Bert Scholtens - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 147 (1):239-240.
Reactions of Potential Jurors to a Hypothetical Malpractice Suit Alleging Failure to Perform a Prostate-Specific Antigen Test.Michael J. Barry, Pamela H. Wescott, Ellen J. Reifler, Yuchaio Chang & Benjamin W. Moulton - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):396-402.
— Philosophy and medicine —.Agnieszka Jaworska - unknown
Ethics of routine: a critical analysis of the concept of ‘routinisation’ in prenatal screening.Adriana Kater-Kuipers, Inez D. de Beaufort, Robert-Jan H. Galjaard & Eline M. Bunnik - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (9):626-631.
Discussion: Screening-off and visibility to selection. [REVIEW]Christopher Read Hitchcock - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (4):521-529.
Challenging the rhetoric of choice in prenatal screening.Victoria Seavilleklein - 2008 - Bioethics 23 (1):68-77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-21

Downloads
15 (#952,044)

6 months
2 (#1,206,195)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fernando J. Muñoz
University of California, Los Angeles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

View all 11 references / Add more references