AI Risk Assessment: A Scenario-Based, Proportional Methodology for the AI Act

Digital Society 3 (13):1-29 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) defines four risk categories for AI systems: unacceptable, high, limited, and minimal. However, it lacks a clear methodology for the assessment of these risks in concrete situations. Risks are broadly categorized based on the application areas of AI systems and ambiguous risk factors. This paper suggests a methodology for assessing AI risk magnitudes, focusing on the construction of real-world risk scenarios. To this scope, we propose to integrate the AIA with a framework developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports and related literature. This approach enables a nuanced analysis of AI risk by exploring the interplay between (a) risk determinants, (b) individual drivers of determinants, and (c) multiple risk types. We further refine the proposed methodology by applying a proportionality test to balance the competing values involved in AI risk assessment. Finally, we present three uses of this approach under the AIA: to implement the Regulation, to assess the significance of risks, and to develop internal risk management systems for AI deployers.

Similar books and articles

Proportionality in international law.Michael A. Newton - 2014 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Edited by Larry May.
Editorial: Risks of general artificial intelligence.Vincent C. Müller - 2014 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 26 (3):297-301.
Risks of artificial general intelligence.Vincent C. Müller (ed.) - 2014 - Taylor & Francis (JETAI).
Risks of artificial intelligence.Vincent C. Müller (ed.) - 2016 - CRC Press - Chapman & Hall.
Artificial intelligence and the ethics of human extinction.T. Lorenc - 2015 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 22 (9-10):194-214.
A critique of proportionality and balancing.Urbina Molfino & Francisco Javier - 2017 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-31

Downloads
1,003 (#13,749)

6 months
409 (#4,369)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

References found in this work

A Theory of Constitutional Rights.Robert Alexy - 2002 - Oxford University Press UK.
Incompleteness and reasoned choice.Amartya Sen - 2004 - Synthese 140 (1-2):43 - 59.
A Quantitative Approach to Proportionality.Giovanni Sartor - 2011 - In Colin Aitken, Amalia Amaya, Kevin D. Ashley, Carla Bagnoli, Giorgio Bongiovanni, Bartosz Brożek, Cristiano Castelfranchi, Samuele Chilovi, Marcello Di Bello, Jaap Hage, Kenneth Einar Himma, Lewis A. Kornhauser, Emiliano Lorini, Fabrizio Macagno, Andrei Marmor, J. J. Moreso, Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor, Burkhard Schafer, Chiara Valentini, Bart Verheij, Douglas Walton & Wojciech Załuski (eds.), Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag. pp. 613-636.

Add more references