Improper self-reference in classical logic and the prediction paradox

Logique Et Analyse 10 (2):167-172 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2273020

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review: M. J. O'Carroll, Improper Self-Reference in Classical Logic and the Prediction Paradox; M. J. O'Carroll, A Three-Valued, Non-Levelled Logic Consistent for all Self-Reference. [REVIEW]James Cargile - 1972 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (2):422-423.
Review: David Kaplan, Richard Montague, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic: A Paradox Regained; Martin Gardner, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science: A New Prediction Paradox; K. R. Popper, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science:A Comment on the New Prediction Paradox. [REVIEW]James Cargile - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (1):102-103.
On the Jeffreys-Lindley Paradox.Christian P. Robert - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (2):216-232,.
Blindspots, self-reference and the prediction paradox.Tjeerd B. Jongeling & Teun Koetsier - 2002 - Philosophia 29 (1-4):377-391.
The lesson of Newcomb’s paradox.David H. Wolpert & Gregory Benford - 2013 - Synthese 190 (9):1637-1646.
Curry's revenge: the costs of non-classical solutions to the paradoxes of self-reference.Greg Restall - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
The knower paradox in the light of provability interpretations of modal logic.Paul Égré - 2004 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (1):13-48.
Revising Up: Strengthening Classical Logic in the Face of Paradox.David Ripley - 2013 - Philosophers' Imprint 13.
The logic of “improper cross”.Joseph S. Fulda - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (4):337-341.
Confirmation, paradox, and logic.Leif Eriksen - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (4):681-687.
Yablo's paradox and referring to infinite objects.O. Bueno & M. Colyvan - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):402 – 412.
Equiparadoxicality of Yablo’s Paradox and the Liar.Ming Hsiung - 2013 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22 (1):23-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-11

Downloads
13 (#1,060,385)

6 months
6 (#581,183)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On paradoxes and a surprise exam.Richard L. Kirkham - 1991 - Philosophia 21 (1-2):31-51.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references