- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Introduction
In Martin O'Neill & Thad Williamson (eds.), Property‐Owning Democracy. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 1–14 (2012-02-17)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Justice as Fairness and Property‐Owning Democracy Part One: Property‐Owning Democracy: Theoretical Foundations Part Two: Interrogating Property‐Owning Democracy: Work, Gender, Political Economy Part Three: Toward a Practical Politics of Property‐Owning Democracy: Program and Politics References.Author Profiles
principles of justice for a society, to the idea of free/equal persons Rawls's liberal egalitarian, “property‐owning democracy” taken seriously religious beliefs or other life ideals, as hindrance to political unity purely ideal theory, and institutional arrangements Rawls and social thought, questions of justice as holistic institutional “property‐owning democracy” dovetailing with democratic socialism property‐owning democracy and welfare state capitalism welfare state capitalism, undercutting equal relationships market encroachment, fiscal crisis undercutting democratic states Rawlsian justice as fairness sharing the socialist, in finding different ways
My notes
Similar books and articles
Property Owning Democracy, Liberal Republicanism, and the Idea of an Egalitarian Ethos.Alan Thomas - 2012 - In T. Williamson (ed.), Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond. Wiley-Blackwell.
Property‐Owning Democracy, Liberal Republicanism, and the Idea of an Egalitarian Ethos.Alan Thomas - 2012-02-17 - In Martin O'Neill & Thad Williamson (eds.), Property‐Owning Democracy. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 101–128.
Free (and Fair) Markets without Capitalism.Martin O'neill - 2012-02-17 - In Martin O'Neill & Thad Williamson (eds.), Property‐Owning Democracy. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 75–100.
Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond.Martin O'Neill & Thad Williamson (eds.) - 2012 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Property-Owning Democracy and the Demands of Justice.Martin O'Neill & Thad Williamson - 2009 - Living Reviews in Democracy 1:1-10.
Incentives and Justice: G A Cohen's Critique of Rawls.Paul Smith - 1998 - Social Theory and Practice 24 (2):205-235.
Property‐Owning Democracy and Republican Citizenship.Stuart White - 2012-02-17 - In Martin O'Neill & Thad Williamson (eds.), Property‐Owning Democracy. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 129–146.
Visions of democracy in 'property-owning democracy': Skelton to Rawls and beyond.Amit Ron - 2008 - History of Political Thought 29 (1):89-108.
Nurturing the Sense of Justice.Waheed Hussain - 2012-02-17 - In Martin O'Neill & Thad Williamson (eds.), Property‐Owning Democracy. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 180–200.
A Property Owning Democracy or a Liberal (Democratic) Socialism?Wonsup Jung - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 41:132-139.
A moral and economic critique of the new property-owning democrats: on behalf of a Rawlsian welfare state.Kevin Vallier - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (2):283-304.
The Requirements of Justice and Liberal Socialism.Justin P. Holt - 2017 - Analyse & Kritik 39 (1):171-194.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
16 (#909,949)
6 months
14 (#182,887)
2023-06-15
Downloads
16 (#909,949)
6 months
14 (#182,887)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Liberalism and Social Theory after John Rawls.Katrina Forrester - 2022 - Analyse & Kritik 44 (1):1-22.
When Is Work Unjust? Confronting the Choice between ‘Pluralistic’ and ‘Unifying’ Approaches.Sarah C. Goff - 2024 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 41 (2):218-234.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-9vkzx uwo